|
Hackensack Riverkeeper, NY/NJ Baykeeper Place Polluters On Notice Of Intent To Sue Over Contaminated Discharges To River Hackensack Riverkeeper
and NY/NJ Baykeeper have placed several companies on notice of their intent to
sue over pollution discharges at a former industrial site located on the
Hackensack River in Kearny, Hudson County, New Jersey. The notice letter was
sent to Standard Chlorine Chemical Co., Beazer East, Inc., Occidental Chemical
Corporation, Tierra Solutions, Inc., AG Bayer, and Sybron Chemicals. The
environmental groups seek to halt the imminent and substantial endangerment to
health and the environment associated with polluted discharges from the site.
The intended lawsuit will be brought under the federal Resource Conservation
and Recovery Act (“RCR”) after the 90-day notice period expires. “Sampling from the site
shows that it is heavily contaminated with many different chemicals, including
dioxin, naphthalene, chromium, benzene, PCBs, and various chlorinated
benzenes,” said Captain Bill Sheehan, executive director, Hackensack
Riverkeeper. “These hazardous wastes
are contaminating the Hackensack River and placing human health and the
environmental risk.” The site covers
approximately 25 acres of land in an industrial area of Hudson County. Over the
years the companies operated various chemical manufacturing and processing
facilities at the site, including producing and refining crude naphthalene,
storing and packaging 1,4-dichlorobenzene moth preventatives and deodorizers,
producing dye carriers, and the processing of liquid petroleum naphthalene for
the manufacture of moth balls and flakes.
Manufacturing operations at the site ceased around 1993. “This site has been
under an administrative consent order with the New Jersey Department of
Environmental Protection since 1989 to be cleaned up,” said Andrew Willner,
NY/NJ Baykeeper. “But here we are, over
15 years later, and the site is still polluting our community’s rivers and
bays.” In March of 2003, the United
States Environmental Protection Agency reported that it anticipated listing the
site on the National Priority List or Superfund within the next few months. In October of 2003,
NJDEP asked EPA not to list the site on the NPL because a cleanup was about to
commence under State authority. To date, this cleanup has not yet materialized. “Off-site sampling and
observations indicate that discharges of hazardous substances from the site to
the Hackensack River have occurred in the past and are ongoing,” stated Richard
Webster, Staff Attorney, Rutgers Environmental Law Clinic. “For instance, NJDEP
has issued fish consumption advisories for the Hackensack River due to PCB and
dioxin contamination, which is caused in part by releases of such substances
from the site.” The environmental groups
intend to file the suit in the United States District Court for the District of
New Jersey and will, among other things, ask the Court to order the notices
parties to carry out appropriate abatement measures to effectively remedy the
current endangerment to health and the environment. |